USA Today tackles Playing Gods
Nationwide rag USA Today reviews Playing Gods, the role-playing game created by Skeptical Inquirer managing editor Ben Radford. The article is mostly accurate (although the reporter refers to Atlanta-based Dragon*Con, where Playing Gods debuted last fall, as “DragonCom”).
Playing Gods is, in case you didn’t know, a tongue-in-cheek take on religion and the violence it can breed.
What infuriates me is the unchallenged statement by Univ. of Denver professor of religious studies Carl Raschke: “[Playing Gods] just appeals to…the hip subculture of militant popular atheists. These people are fanatics, for the most part, themselves. Their thinking is rigid and hostile and not much different from jihadists who don’t use their minds or study what they are dealing with.” Yes, you read him right. Raschke is equating atheists who role-play to sadistic terrorists who cut people’s heads off and post the video online. (I’m also puzzled by the word “popular” wedged in between “militant” and “atheists”. For that matter, I’m puzzled by the word “militant”. How many atheists do you know who horde guns, start fistfights, take to the streets, or generally act “militant”?) Please tell me he’s been misquoted.
November 17th, 2008 at 10:53 pm
I’m starting to get pissed off at the morons that continue to use the word militant and atheist together. They’re playing word games to make us look like the radicals.
Albert puts it best in this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5OEocRp2wA
November 18th, 2008 at 3:28 pm
I’m a militant humanist. Be nice to me or I’ll kill you!