<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defining Anti-theism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.americanfreethought.com/wordpress/2009/07/29/defining-anti-theism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.americanfreethought.com/wordpress/2009/07/29/defining-anti-theism/</link>
	<description>Question.  Think.  Decide.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:05:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Andreas Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.americanfreethought.com/wordpress/2009/07/29/defining-anti-theism/comment-page-1/#comment-4407</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Andreas Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 04:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanfreethought.com/wordpress/?p=1097#comment-4407</guid>
		<description>I consider myself a hard anti-theist, but that does not mean that I am against religious art.  Even being a hard anti-theist does not mean that I ought to destroy such art.  In fact, I think such art in some ways can be, and often should be, reworked into a secular context.

This is sort of like how I collaborated with an artist to secularize some Russian Orthodox Icons of OTMA (Tsar Nicholas II&#039;s four daughters):

Originals:
http://i42.tinypic.com/30wtvyo.jpg

Mine:
http://diesgaudii.genvid.com/off/gina/otma.jpg

There are other ways to be an iconoclast (pun intended).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I consider myself a hard anti-theist, but that does not mean that I am against religious art.  Even being a hard anti-theist does not mean that I ought to destroy such art.  In fact, I think such art in some ways can be, and often should be, reworked into a secular context.</p>
<p>This is sort of like how I collaborated with an artist to secularize some Russian Orthodox Icons of OTMA (Tsar Nicholas II&#8217;s four daughters):</p>
<p>Originals:<br />
<a href="http://i42.tinypic.com/30wtvyo.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://i42.tinypic.com/30wtvyo.jpg</a></p>
<p>Mine:<br />
<a href="http://diesgaudii.genvid.com/off/gina/otma.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://diesgaudii.genvid.com/off/gina/otma.jpg</a></p>
<p>There are other ways to be an iconoclast (pun intended).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Milner</title>
		<link>http://www.americanfreethought.com/wordpress/2009/07/29/defining-anti-theism/comment-page-1/#comment-4320</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Milner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 03:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanfreethought.com/wordpress/?p=1097#comment-4320</guid>
		<description>I think we can distill this down even further- yes, Mr. Wright, if you are an atheist, you very likely think religion is a bad idea.  Thank you Captain Obvious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we can distill this down even further- yes, Mr. Wright, if you are an atheist, you very likely think religion is a bad idea.  Thank you Captain Obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daneel</title>
		<link>http://www.americanfreethought.com/wordpress/2009/07/29/defining-anti-theism/comment-page-1/#comment-4317</link>
		<dc:creator>Daneel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanfreethought.com/wordpress/?p=1097#comment-4317</guid>
		<description>Dave, 
if you think that there&#039;s no convincing evidence of the existence of a god, then it follows that people who believe are mistaken in believing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave,<br />
if you think that there&#8217;s no convincing evidence of the existence of a god, then it follows that people who believe are mistaken in believing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.americanfreethought.com/wordpress/2009/07/29/defining-anti-theism/comment-page-1/#comment-4312</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanfreethought.com/wordpress/?p=1097#comment-4312</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t give a shit what you call me as long as you know that I no belief in gods or supernatural crap.

I&#039;m at the point now that I&#039;m embarrassed if someone thinks I believe in that garbage. It&#039;s not a compliment when people think you believe in imaginary friends and horoscopes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t give a shit what you call me as long as you know that I no belief in gods or supernatural crap.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m at the point now that I&#8217;m embarrassed if someone thinks I believe in that garbage. It&#8217;s not a compliment when people think you believe in imaginary friends and horoscopes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John C. Snider</title>
		<link>http://www.americanfreethought.com/wordpress/2009/07/29/defining-anti-theism/comment-page-1/#comment-4309</link>
		<dc:creator>John C. Snider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanfreethought.com/wordpress/?p=1097#comment-4309</guid>
		<description>Dave,

You may have a point.  I have heard it said that one can be simultaneously an atheist and an agnostic; however, &quot;I don&#039;t believe but I&#039;m not sure&quot; translates, IMHO, to &quot;I&#039;m not sure&quot; which translates ultimately, to being only an agnostic and not really an atheist.  :)  

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave,</p>
<p>You may have a point.  I have heard it said that one can be simultaneously an atheist and an agnostic; however, &#8220;I don&#8217;t believe but I&#8217;m not sure&#8221; translates, IMHO, to &#8220;I&#8217;m not sure&#8221; which translates ultimately, to being only an agnostic and not really an atheist.  :)  </p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave B.</title>
		<link>http://www.americanfreethought.com/wordpress/2009/07/29/defining-anti-theism/comment-page-1/#comment-4308</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanfreethought.com/wordpress/?p=1097#comment-4308</guid>
		<description>Being an atheist does not necessarily mean that you believe that theists are mistaken.  Plenty of atheists (who may prefer to be called agnostics) simply aren&#039;t convinced that there is a god.  This does not necessitate being convinced that there isn&#039;t a god.   I&#039;m surprised to see you glossing over this point here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being an atheist does not necessarily mean that you believe that theists are mistaken.  Plenty of atheists (who may prefer to be called agnostics) simply aren&#8217;t convinced that there is a god.  This does not necessitate being convinced that there isn&#8217;t a god.   I&#8217;m surprised to see you glossing over this point here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

