Posts Tagged ‘evolution’

Man obsessed with overpopulation terrorizes Discovery Channel

Wednesday, September 1st, 2010

It’s been all over the news today that a man armed with a gun and a suspected bomb stormed into the Discovery Channel building in Silver Springs, Maryland, took hostages, and was eventually killed by the police.  No one else was harmed.

In a bizarre manifesto entitled simply “My Demands” James J. Lee rants about overpopulation, evolution, and Daniel Quinn’s 1992 book Ishmael (which Lee incorrectly identifies as “My Ishmael”).

Lee apparently had an obsession with babies as a threat to the ecosystem.  He refers to them variously as “filthy human children,” “disgusting human babies,” and “parasitic human infants.”  He also calls for an end to TV programming that glorifies large families and military technology.

In several places, Lee mentions Malthus, Darwin, and evolution; for example: “Develop shows that mention the Malthusian sciences about how food production leads to the overpopulation of the Human race. Talk about Evolution. Talk about Malthus and Darwin until it sinks into the stupid people’s brains until they get it!!”  As a reminder, Thomas Malthus (1766-1834) who theorized that the increase in population would soon outstrip the available of resources like food and lead to inevitable disaster.  Malthus’ theory was a key influence in Charles Darwin’s development of the theory of evolution by natural selection.  Although population growth is a major social problem, we have yet to realize the direst Malthusian predictions, partly due to advances in food production by people like Norman Borlaug.

It’s easy to sympathize with Lee’s frustrations.  Only a fool would claim that overpopulation is NOT a problem.  I, too, loathe programs that glorify gigantic families and the supposedly heroic attempts to conceive multiple babies.  And while the little boy in me does enjoy watching documentaries about the latest military wizardry, I understand that such shows can lead some Americans into a false sense of technological invulnerability.

That said, Lee was clearly a disturbed man and not typical of people who understand the subtleties of Darwinian evolution.  The way forward is through education and easy access to birth control, not taking hostages and blathering about “filthy babies.”

I’m sure more details will emerge in the coming weeks.

  • Share/Bookmark

Teach the controversy: Russian edition

Thursday, June 10th, 2010

We’ve gotten used to hearing that Creationism and Intelligent Design are peculiar to the United States.  Other places, especially Europe, not so much.

Unfortunately, that is changing.  There’s increasing pressure from religious factions in the United Kingdom, and Australians continue to play the occasional game of whack-a-mole with Creationists.

Now the Russians are feeling the heat.  The Russian Orthodox Church has launched its own version of “teach the controversy,” insisting that  “several theories” about the origin of life should be taught alongside the Darwinian theory of evolution.  Archbishop Hilarion (love the name) decries the “monopoly of Darwinism” in Russian schools.  Of course, the good Archbishop does not decry the monopoly of Russian Orthodoxy in his own pulpit, and I’m sure he would shrink at the suggestion that “several theories” of religious belief be taught regularly alongside his own.  Good for the goose and all that jazz.

Oh, and if you read the article all the way through, you’ll also find the Russian version of “Russia is a Christian nation.”  Enjoy!

  • Share/Bookmark

Homeschooled = Evangelical?

Sunday, March 7th, 2010

I’m not opposed to homeschooling on general principle.  I think it’s possible for reasonably intelligent parents to provide their children a decent education at home.  Unfortunately, in the United States the word “homeschooler” has an incredibly strong correlation with “evangelical brainwasher.”  This recent news article reveals that the vast majority of American homeschoolers do so, not because they think they are better at teaching math at home, but rather for religious reasons.  Indeed, as the article discusses, there’s a frightening number of publishers who put out textbooks that are really just delivery systems for fundamentalist propaganda–especially when it comes to evolution.  Alas.

  • Share/Bookmark

Podcast #82 – Creation

Friday, February 26th, 2010

Allison’s back–yay!  She joins us to discuss the new Charles Darwin bio-pic Creation, starring real-life husband-and-wife Paul Bettany and Jennifer Connelly as Charles and Emma Darwin.  Creation is based on the nonfiction book Annie’s Box (published in the US as Darwin, His Daughter, and Human Evolution, and reissued in conjunction with the film as Creation) by Darwin descendant Randal Keynes.  Creation is currently in limited release, so check your local art cinema to see if and when it might play in your neighborhood.  For more visit CreationtheMovie.com.

Thanks to the many fellow science fans who joined us for the Creation screening at Atlanta’s Landmark Midtown Art Cinema.  And thanks to Royal Orchid Thai Cuisine for accommodating our unexpected horde.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

The Tangled Bank

Saturday, October 24th, 2009

Review by John C. Snider © 2009

I haven’t had a biology class since I was in high school in the late 1970s.  Despite two college degrees filled with math, engineering and chemistry, I never took any more biology; as a result, most of what I know about biology in general, and evolution in particular, I’ve picked up from magazine articles, internet resources and the occasional TV documentary.  So I was very excited when I heard that Richard Dawkins’ new book (The Greatest Show on Earth) would be devoted to the evidence for evolution by natural selection.  I was equally excited to discover that the latest book by science journalist Carl Zimmer is a textbook titled The Tangled Bank: An Introduction to Evolution (pub. by Roberts & Company, Oct 2009, 385 pp hdcvr, $59.95)

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Why can’t Darwin film find a US distributor?

Saturday, September 12th, 2009

The Sydney Morning Herald has reported that the new film Creation (starring husband-and-wife actors Paul Bettany and Jennifer Connelly as Charles Darwin and wife Emma Darwin) has failed to find a distributor in the United States.  The film deals with Darwin’s life after his ’round-the-world voyage on the Beagle and his personal struggle to come to terms with the theory of evolution by natural selection.  The film has been screened in various places, including the Toronto Film Festival, and has received generally positive reviews.  Dr. Eugenie Scott of the National Center for Science Education calls it “a thoughtful, well-made film that will change many views of Darwin held by the public—for the good.”

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Bob Wright on the Behe Brouhaha: Mea Culpa

Tuesday, September 8th, 2009

I know I’ve posted about this a couple of times before, but this onion keeps growing new layers.  Over the weekend, bloggingheads.tv Robert Wright (The Evolution of God) posted a conversation with science journalist George Johnson, in which Wright offers a very detailed explanation of how the Michael Behe/John McWhorter diavlog got posted, then removed, then re-posted.  In the aftermath of the incident, a handful of scientists and/or science journalists who have participated on bhTV have vowed never to be on again.  Oh, and Bob Wright also addresses (sort of) the insinuations and rumors that he’s angling for the high-dollar Templeton Prize.  Enjoy:

  • Share/Bookmark

The Behe brouhaha at bloggingheads.tv

Monday, August 31st, 2009

Boy, what a soap opera this has turned out to be. Late last week, linguist and conservative pundit John McWhorter recorded a segment for bloggingheads.tv (bhTV) with Michael “Irreducible Complexity” Behe.   A credulous–even gushing–McWhorter, who is a self-admitted nonbeliever, began by heaping praise on Behe’s most recent book The Edge of Evolution.   The 44-minute conversation is unremarkable, given that a linguist isn’t exactly the best conversational partner to pair up with a guy like Behe, and doesn’t break new ground on the supposed controversy of Intelligent Design.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

The Voyage that Shook the World

Wednesday, August 19th, 2009

by John C. Snider © 2009

If you buy the latest Creationist explanation, Charles Darwin was a fantasy-prone naif who “fabricated stories” as a boy, fell for a bunch of geological uniformitarianist claptrap, got mad at God for the deaths of three of his ten children, and kluged together the Theory of Evolution by cherrypicking the data he collected on his famous round-the-world voyage.  Plus he was a racist precisely because he believed that, while all human beings are derived from a common ancestor, some were more evolved than others.

As you probably already know, 2009 marks both Charles Darwin’s 200th birthday and the 150th anniversary of the publication of his magnum opus The Origin of Species.  Lovers of science have been celebrating all year, but Creationists–still smarting from recent legal setbacks involving teaching Intelligent Design in public schools, and increasingly desperate to sound “sciencey” when discussing their discredited theories–are determined not to be outdone in the Year of Darwin.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Intelligence Without Design: A Third Way?

Tuesday, August 4th, 2009

by John C. Snider © 2009

We’re all familiar with the debate: either the universe was created by an intelligent creator, or it’s the result of natural forces and random happenstance, with no purpose or direction except that which we give ourselves.  In other words, Intelligent Design vs. Scientific Naturalism.

But maybe there’s a third way.  Maybe it’s all the result, not of Intelligent Design, but of Intelligence without Design.  That’s the central thesis of an essay by Joel Kramer and Diana Alstad, published last month in Guernica Magazine.  Joel Kramer is the author of the 1974 self-help book The Passionate Mind, and describes himself as “an early innovator in the modern American physical and mental yoga.”   Kramer’s life partner Diana Alstad is a feminist and teacher of women’s studies.  The essay “Intelligence Without Design” is part of their new book The Passionate Mind Revisited: Expanding Personal and Social Awareness, an update of Kramer’s book.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark